People in general make decisions by their feelings and it is generally accepted that they are able to deal with a potential enemy far better than politicians. According to the state of affairs in Syria, Ukraine, and elsewhere, we have seen that world leading politicians have not been able to agree on a solution acceptable to all the most powerful forces on Earth for decades. With good will, such an agreement is possible. Let's seek for particular solutions by discussion among people as much as possible from around the world and seek for questions showing clearly who of the politicians really has a good will for such an agreement on the basis of balance.
In the beginning of our activities, it has been shown that such an agreement of general people on a particular solution proposal is quite possible, see the result of the first such vote here further on. We will try to prove it for as many people as possible from around the world. Attracting other people’s interest in what they can do for all of the people on Earth is just what Masaryk's work consisted of. According to us, again and again people should realize it by personal contacts; and 'not to be afraid and to be fair' as true democrats according to the work of President Masaryk. That is the only way how to overcome the widespread opinion that nothing can be done to save us! The open discussion and agreement of people of goodwill is, according to Masaryk, the basis of a properly working and true democracy; it should not be a problem in our more open pole. And the survival of mankind is the interest of all, also the people of the other pole; let us use all the possibilities to involve people from the other pole in organizing the vote, so that the outcome was credible for all the world politics and especially for both pole politics leaders.
Moreover, let us seek for a better solution and work to make politicians aware that someone can effectively ask them about it.
We wish to remain neutral concerning the area of strongly opposing world political views. According to our Statutes, we shall publish the number of our members and amount of donations by categories according to country of residence. The categories express the relationship of a country to NATO or SCO, therefore also to the USA or Russia.
The major objective of our Association will be: Spreading awareness that a solution, which sufficiently compensates the interests of the world's most powerful forces does exist and that the military balance of the two poles can be adequately checked by peaceful means at the nowadays cost of arms; therefore the solution depends mainly on two top politicians to make a positive agreement on it. That military balance should act as a fence between the gardens of two neighbors. We note which states and which institutions are interested in not agreeing of the two. Who, for example, devised to organize and who did the affair with a hole in a Russian spacecraft, so transparently aimed at bursting of the US and Russian parts of the crew of the international space station? Perhaps we do not need to repeat who had an initiative to propagate it.
The list of the first members is in that link. We invite further interested people also from other UN member states to join us and possibly write us their suggestions concerning the solution and the query, most preferably with the consent of publication in the correspondence section Ideas from other People on this site; we are prepared to publish that also anonymously according to the rules below the list. We see as useful to establish not only local units of our Association but also similar associations in other UN member states and to cooperate with them, especially to spread awareness of the issue, so that even the non-organized people realize that their interest in the fundamental issue of world security is vitally important.
That mentioned result of our first vote is in the minutes of the General Meeting 29.11.17.
We believe that the God of every world religion will help those who make this world cooperation.
RNDr. Tomáš Pečený
All of our texts are composed of parts made together by more people in different languages. Where I am not sure which language version is better, especially in titles, I leave both versions, even though they do not have exactly the same meaning. Those of us, who are translating, are encouraged to choose from that versions; their version is then preferred in further attempts to unify that meaning.
RNDr. Tomáš Pečený